The quake was centered five miles east-northeast of Noble and eight miles southeast of Norman. The U.S. Geological Survey originally categorized the quake at 4.3 magnitude, but the Oklahoma Geological Survey later came out with its own assessment of 5.1 (for comparison, the quake that devastated Haiti earlier this year was categorized initially as a 7.0).
Just what accounted for the variation in measurements?
The Oklahoma Geological Survey Observatory explains:
Worryingly for Oklahomans, the state's geological survey notes that similar earthquakes could occur "at any time." In fact, though several outlets reported that this was the first quake in years, the Oklahoma Geological Survey disagreed, pointing out that a 4.1 earthquake had occurred in February, and that 2010 was overall a banner year for earthquakes in the state. Indeed, a cursory look back through the year in the eyes of local publications reveals a spate of observed earthquakes in early 2010.These are two different estimates of an earthquake's size. They are two common seismological methods for determining the size, or magnitude, of an earthquake, which cannot be measured directly. They often have discrepancies similar to those that we are seeing for this earthquake. It is entirely possible that the magnitude estimates will change over time as further work is done to measure the size of the earthquake.
What causes Oklahoma earthquakes, though?
All scientific parties are in agreement that the state is riddled with fault lines, including the Meers fault, which could be to blame, but others hypothesized that increased oil and gas drilling activity could have played a part as well. As NewsOK reported:
A joke, we suspect.As for the coincidence of Wednesday's test, the researchers found it amusing and maybe just bit appropriate.
"We call ourselves earthquake engineers, maybe we engineer earthquakes," Dr. Bob Nigbor [UCLA] said.
Follow Surge Desk on Twitter.




