Should anyone listen to them? Or would you be better off heading over to the local fortune teller?
Given the track record of some pundits, that's a tough call.
Consider how well the punditocracy did after the last big election in 2008. That one saw President Barack Obama win and Democrats expand their majorities in the House and Senate. And it saw a flurry of expert forecasts about the utterly bleak and hopeless future of the GOP.
Here are some of my favorites:
Off by just 38 years ...
"Today, a Democratic majority is emerging, and it's my hypothesis, one I share with a great many others, that this majority will guarantee the Democrats remain in power for the next 40 years."
"Obama ... and his successors could dominate U.S. national politics for the next 30 or even 40 years."
"We are witnessing the creation of a permanent progressive majority."
"The Republican Party is now attached to a political movement -- a media-led movement -- that cannot win elections. ... The GOP may be assigning itself a permanent minority status."
News of their death was somewhat exaggerated ...
"The Republicans, arguably, are in something of a death spiral."
"[Republicans are] starting to look like the Federalists of the early 19th century: an embittered, over-the-top, out-of-touch regional party en route to extinction, doubling down on dogma the electorate has already rejected."
Did he mean to say "crushed like a sponge"?
"The conservative movement brought about by the Gingrich revolution has been crushed. ... There has been a change in the way we think about society and the economy, and Democrats have a huge advantage."
Someone was drunk alright ...
"Drunk on self-delusion, a staggering GOP whistles past the electoral graveyard, missing the whole point of this election: the center has shifted, and positions that used to be considered 'left wing' ... are now solidly mainstream."
It depends on what the meaning of "considerable" means ...
"In all likelihood, Republicans can look forward to a considerable period on the sidelines."
Maybe he forgot to take global warming into account?
"A GOP ice age is on the way."
To be fair, after the 2008 election, things did look very bad for Republicans. But how did these "experts" miss the fact that just a few years earlier, Republicans were busy making the exact same claims about their own "permanent majority" after the 2004 elections? Shouldn't that have clued them in to the dangers of making such grand proclamations?
And it's worth noting that not everyone failed so miserably back in 2008.
And Michael Barone, writing in U.S. News and World Report on Dec. 2, 2008, in a piece warning against reading too much into the 2008 election, noted how voters "seemed to be willing to switch their votes in response to events" and that "they may be willing to switch again."
Of course, who knows. Maybe the pundits are just as wrong in predicting that this election will be a big win for the Republicans.
However the vote turns out, you'd be well advised to keep all this in mind as they start making their big, brassy pronouncements in the wake of Tuesday's election.





