AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.

Click here to visit the new home of AOL News!

Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories
Opinion

Opinion: Capt. Kirk Was Right -- Read the Constitution

Jan 4, 2011 – 2:08 PM
Text Size
John Merline

John Merline Opinion Editor

It's been amusing to read the reaction in some quarters to the House Republicans' decision to read the entire U.S. Constitution at the start of the new Congress.

Last week, Washington Post columnist and blogger Ezra Klein called it a "gimmick."

Post blogger Greg Sargent added his two cents, calling it "a cheap way of humoring activists."

A blogger on Firedoglake went a little further, dismissing it as an example of the House "shamelessly pandering" to the tea party.

David Corn over at our Politics Daily site said the House GOP was turning the Constitution "into hollow political ammo."

Seriously? What's the beef?

It's a waste of time? True, but we're talking about a legislative body that spends the vast bulk of its legislative efforts naming post offices.

It politicizes the Constitution? It's hard to fathom how reading a document out loud is akin to politicizing it.

It's purely symbolic? Maybe so. But then again, Americans are woefully uninformed about what's in the Constitution, according to a survey last fall by the James Madison's Montpelier organization. So reading it in public every once in a while can't hurt.

In my mind, the only real question is not whether the U.S. Constitution should be read on the House floor, but who should read it. A bunch of boring lawmakers nobody's ever heard of? No way.

If the GOP really wants people to sit up and pay attention to the country's founding document, they need to think big.

Here are a few suggestions:

How about getting William Shatner to do it? After all, he's already read the preamble, in a stirring speech at the end of "Star Trek's" "The Omega Glory" episode (in which he makes an impassioned case for reading the Constitution).




Or maybe try James Earl Jones? I mean, the guy can make counting to 10 engaging.




What about Sam Elliott? (Watch the clip if you don't recognize the name.)



Why not get that movie trailer voice-over guy, Hal Douglas? (Of course, he might be tempted to replace "We the people" with "In a world where ...").




Or, better still, maybe the Republican leadership could try to round up all those actors who read the Declaration of Independence a while back?




Now that would be something worth getting all worked up about.
Filed under: Opinion
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.


2011 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Comments

186 comments

  • I support reading the Constitution. We should all do it. It's too bad the Republicans don't know what is in it. And frankly I don't think they care.

    Pagan

    Tue Jan 04 18:54:06 EST 2011

  • As a left wing liberal, libetarian, iconoclast I encourage everyone not to wait for someone to read the constitution to them but to read it for themselves... on a reguar basis. America needs reminding what freedom, and the ordeal of protecting it, are all about.

    tzentpr

    Tue Jan 04 19:27:36 EST 2011

  • I don't see why there is all of this mockery on the part of liberal-progressive-socialists about the Congress taking the floor and reading the US Constitution, the document that they swear an oath to uphold. I don't see why there is such a swell of disdain that it is proposed that all bills must show how they are justifed by the constitution, before they can be voted on. It is about time that the politicians remember that the US Constitution is more important and greater than any of them combined. Not a single president or congressmen has come even close to having the foresight or intelligence, of even the dimmest of the Founding Fathers.

    rsell67

    Tue Jan 04 22:03:48 EST 2011

Add your comment

ON FACEBOOK